Legal Opinion

Hansen v. Sandridge Partners, L.P.

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided April 6, 2018No. F073106PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, P.J.

*1024Respondent and cross-appellant Erik Hansen and several relatives (the "Hansens") own about 382 acres of farmland in Tulare County (APN 291-010-009; the "09 parcel"). Appellant and cross-respondent Sandridge Partners, L.P., (Sandridge) owns an adjacent parcel of about 250 acres (APN 291-010-005; the "05 parcel").1 This case centers around approximately 10 acres on the southwest part of Sandridge's 05 parcel. The parties refer to this roughly triangular-shaped area as the "Disputed Land."

Hansen Ranches, a partnership between Erik and several relatives, has farmed the 09 parcel for as long as…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. City of Pasadena v. California-Michigan Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
  2. O'BANION v. BorbaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Hirshfield v. SchwartzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. Christensen v. TuckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Warsaw v. Chicago Metallic Ceilings, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ranch At the Falls LLC v. O'Neal, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. David Cassirer v. Thyssen-Bornemisza CollectionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
  3. Bailey v. Citibank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2021
  4. Husain v. California Pacific BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
  5. Montecito Country Club, LLC v. RootCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2026

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API