Hansen v. Sandridge Partners, L.P.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtHill, P.J.
*1024Respondent and cross-appellant Erik Hansen and several relatives (the "Hansens") own about 382 acres of farmland in Tulare County (APN 291-010-009; the "09 parcel"). Appellant and cross-respondent Sandridge Partners, L.P., (Sandridge) owns an adjacent parcel of about 250 acres (APN 291-010-005; the "05 parcel").1 This case centers around approximately 10 acres on the southwest part of Sandridge's 05 parcel. The parties refer to this roughly triangular-shaped area as the "Disputed Land."
Hansen Ranches, a partnership between Erik and several relatives, has farmed the 09 parcel for as long as…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- City of Pasadena v. California-Michigan Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
- O'BANION v. BorbaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Hirshfield v. SchwartzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Christensen v. TuckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Warsaw v. Chicago Metallic Ceilings, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ranch At the Falls LLC v. O'Neal, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- David Cassirer v. Thyssen-Bornemisza CollectionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Bailey v. Citibank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Husain v. California Pacific BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
- Montecito Country Club, LLC v. RootCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2026
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.