Legal Opinion

Husain v. California Pacific Bank

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 9, 2021No. A159067Published

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 3/9/21 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO SYED HUSAIN, Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Appellant, A159067 v. (San Mateo County Super. CALIFORNIA PACIFIC Ct. No. 17-CIV-05386) BANK, Defendant, Cross-complainant and Respondent. Syed Husain appeals from a judgment granting a prescriptive easement over portions of Husain’s property on Willow Avenue, Burlingame (the Willow property), a judgment in favor of California Pacific Bank (Bank), the owner of the adjacent property on El Camino Real (the El Camino property).…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Sargon Enterprises, Inc. v. University of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Kuhn v. Department of General ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. Boling v. Public Employment Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Hirshfield v. SchwartzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. Warsaw v. Chicago Metallic Ceilings, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API