Legal Opinion
MacAluso v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 18, 2013No. D063325PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McDONALD, Acting P. J.
Real party in interest Lennar Homes of California, Inc. (Lennar), is a judgment creditor pursuing collection proceedings against its judgment debtor, Mr. Marsch. Lennar served a subpoena duces tecum on petitioner Todd Macaluso (Macaluso) that required Macaluso to produce documents and testify at a judgment debtor examination in connection with Lennar’s judgment collection proceedings. Although Macaluso appeared at the judgment debtor examination, he declined to answer most of the questions, objected to the document production and refused to produce the documents.
Le…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lakin v. Watkins Associated IndustriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Varian Medical Systems, Inc. v. DelfinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Griset v. Fair Political Practices CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Dana Point Safe Harbor Collective v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Oak Grove School District v. City Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Fox Johns Lazar Pekin & Wexler, APC v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Li v. YanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Yolanda's, Inc. v. Kahl & Goveia Commercial Real EstateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Fin. Holding Co. v. Am. Inst. of Certified Tax Coaches, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Wong v. Wong (In re Loy Tim), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.