Legal Opinion
Li v. Yan
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 2, 2016No. A144994PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RICHMAN, J.
Appellant Demas Yan is an attorney. Here, he appears as a judgment debtor, appealing from an “Order Re Subpoena Duces Tecum,” an order made in the course of lengthy—and, from all appearances, unproductive—examination of judgment debtor proceedings attempted against him. Yan makes two arguments, that (1) service of the subpoena requiring production of documents was improper and (2) it was error to deny his claim of privilege as to tax returns. We reject both contentions and affirm the order.
BACKGROUND
The General Setting
This is the second appeal by Yan arising out of a…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Couch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- D. H. Overmyer Co., Inc. of Ohio v. Frick Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Children's Hospital & Medical Center v. BontaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Hammell v. BrittonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Webb v. Standard Oil Co. of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Moorer v. Noble L.A. Events, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Li v. Chiu CA1/3California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Marriage of Tsatryan CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Matthew D. Van Steenwyk, Individually, as Trustee and Beneficiary of The Matthew Van Steenwyk GST Trust and The Matthew Van Steenwyk Issue Trust, and as Co-Trustee of The Gretchen Marie Van Steenwyk-Marsh GST Trust and The Gretchen Marie Van Steenwyk-Marsh Issue Trust and derivatively on behalf of Nominal Defendants Applied Technologies Associates, Inc., Scientific Drilling International, Inc. and ATADistrict Court, C.D. California · 2025
- Moorer v. Noble LA Events Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.