Legal Opinion

Fox Johns Lazar Pekin & Wexler, APC v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 24, 2013No. D062663PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HUFFMAN, J.

Fox Johns Lazar Pekin & Wexler, APC (Fox Johns), represents Point Center Financial, Inc. (Point). Brewer Corporation (Brewer), among others, obtained a money judgment against Point, which is presently on appeal in a related case before this court. As part of its efforts to enforce the judgment, Brewer has proceeded with third party postjudgment discovery against Fox Johns and Michael Wexler, the attorney at Fox Johns primarily responsible for representing Point during the underlying trial. To this end, Brewer served Fox Johns with a subpoena duces tecum for the production of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. People v. WoodheadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Olson v. CoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  4. California Manufacturers Ass'n v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. People Ex Rel. Younger v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Li v. YanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. Yolanda's, Inc. v. Kahl & Goveia Commercial Real EstateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  3. Fin. Holding Co. v. Am. Inst. of Certified Tax Coaches, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  4. Hyundai Motor America v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. Wong v. Wong (In re Loy Tim), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API