Legal Opinion

Dana Point Safe Harbor Collective v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 2010No. S180365PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MORENO, J.

The question posed by these consolidated cases is whether a trial court’s order compelling compliance with a legislative subpoena (Gov. Code, § 37104 et seq.) is appealable. We conclude that it is. Accordingly, we reverse the orders dismissing these appeals and remand the cases to the Court of Appeal for further proceedings.

Facts and Procedural History

Government Code section 37104 gives cities the power to issue legislative subpoenas. In 2009, the City of Dana Point (the City) subpoenaed documents from five medical marijuana dispensaries: Dana Point Safe Harbor Collective,…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Olson v. CoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Morehart v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Griset v. Fair Political Practices CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Arnett v. Dal CieloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Lyon v. GossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. Apex LLC v. Korusfood.comCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. Dhillon v. John Muir HealthCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Judge v. Nijjar Realty, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. MacAluso v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. Gastelum v. Remax International, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API