Dana Point Safe Harbor Collective v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MORENO, J.
The question posed by these consolidated cases is whether a trial court’s order compelling compliance with a legislative subpoena (Gov. Code, § 37104 et seq.) is appealable. We conclude that it is. Accordingly, we reverse the orders dismissing these appeals and remand the cases to the Court of Appeal for further proceedings.
Facts and Procedural History
Government Code section 37104 gives cities the power to issue legislative subpoenas. In 2009, the City of Dana Point (the City) subpoenaed documents from five medical marijuana dispensaries: Dana Point Safe Harbor Collective,…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Olson v. CoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Morehart v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Griset v. Fair Political Practices CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Arnett v. Dal CieloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Lyon v. GossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by85 opinions
- Apex LLC v. Korusfood.comCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Dhillon v. John Muir HealthCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- Judge v. Nijjar Realty, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2014
- MacAluso v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Gastelum v. Remax International, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.