Dearden v. City of Detroit
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRyan, J.
This case requires us to determine whether the Michigan Department of Corrections is subject to the regulation of a municipal zoning ordinance when the department is leasing an existing facility for use as a neighborhood pre-release center. We hold it is not subject to the zoning ordinance.
I
Plaintiff archdiocese has owned the property in Detroit that is the subject of this litigation for some time. In 1938, the archdiocese constructed a three-story, multi-residential structure on that property for use as a convent. When the city adopted a zoning ordinance in 1940, the property was zoned R2…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rutgers v. PilusoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
- Detroit Edison Co. v. City of WixomMichigan Supreme Court · 1969
- Taber v. City of Benton HarborMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
- In Re City of Detroit for Condemnation of Lands for AirportMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
- Dearden v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Oakland County Board v. Michigan Property & Casualty Guaranty Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
- City of Livonia v. Department of Social ServicesMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
- Pittsfield Charter Township v. Washtenaw CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
- Herman v. Berrien CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
- Burt Township v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.