Taber v. City of Benton Harbor
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtChandler, J.
Defendant is a municipal corporation, having been incorporated and having adopted a charter in accordance with the provisions of the home rule act. Act No. 279, Pnb. Acts 1909, as amended (1 Comp. Laws 1929, §2228 et seq.)- By-zoning ordinance, the defendant city is divided into districts, those pertinent to this cause being known as residence districts B and C. The ordinance in question prohibits the erection in district B of buildings for use other than as single-family dwellings, churches, schools, libraries, truck gardening, private clubs and accessory buildings and restricts the height…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Omaha Water Co. v. City of OmahaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
- Canavan v. . City of MechanicvilleNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- C. J. Kubach Co. v. McGuireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Miller Grocery Co. v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
- City of Cincinnati v. WegehoftOhio Supreme Court · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Dearden v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
- City of Pittsburgh v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- McKinney v. City of High PointSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Township of Washington v. Village of RidgewoodSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- City of Scottsdale v. Municipal Court of TempeArizona Supreme Court · 1962
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.