Legal Opinion

Dearden v. City of Detroit

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 20, 1976No. Docket 23431PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtG. W. Britten, J.

The plaintiff archdiocese owns a building in Detroit that was used from 1938 to 1971 as a convent. The building is located in an area zoned R-2 (two-family residences), but its use as a convent was allowed as a nonconforming use after the defendant city adopted its zoning ordinance in 1940. In January, 1971, the archdiocese leased the building to intervening plaintiff, the Michigan Department of Corrections, for use as a rehabilitation center. In June, 1971, the archdiocese applied to the Department of Building and Safety Engineers for permission to use the building as a rehabilitation center…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gust v. Township of CantonMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Detroit Edison Co. v. City of WixomMichigan Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Taber v. City of Benton HarborMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  4. In Re City of Detroit for Condemnation of Lands for AirportMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Township of White Lake v. LustigMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Dearden v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Newman Signs, Inc. v. HjelleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Norton Shores v. CarrMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. MacEnas v. Village of MichianaMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Trip Associates, Inc. v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API