Herman v. Berrien County
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCavanagh, J.
This case involves further analysis of the issue presented in Pittsfield Charter Twp v Washtenaw Co, 468 Mich 702; 664 NW2d 193 (2003), in which we held that the county commissioners act (CCA) 1 has priority over the Township Zoning Act (TZA). 2 Today we are asked to gauge the scope of that priority, which relates to a county’s power to “site” and “erect” “building(s),” by defining the CCA’s term “site.” In defining that term, we hold that land uses that are ancillary to the county building and not indispensable to its normal use are not covered by the CCA’s grant of priority over local…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Sun Valley Foods Co. v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- In Re MCI Telecommunications ComplaintMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Turner v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- People v. KowalskiMichigan Supreme Court · 2011
- People v. Watkins; People v. PullenMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
- McCORMICK v. CARRIERMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
- Bush v. ShabahangMichigan Supreme Court · 2009
- Driver v. NainiMichigan Supreme Court · 2011
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.