Legal Opinion

Rutgers v. Piluso

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 24, 1972PublishedCited by 105 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Haíl, J.

The question presented by this litigation is whether Rutgers, The State University, (“Rutgers”) is subject to the zoning ordinance provisions of a municipality in which one of its campuses is located — here Piscataway Township, Middlesex County. Although the provision precisely involved is a limitation on the permissible number of housing facilities for student families, the broader issue necessarily present encompasses the matter of intergovernmental land use regulation in general as well as the particular status of Rutgers. The Law Division,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Quincy v. SturhahnIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Connolly v. Great Basin Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967

3Cited by105 opinions

  1. City of New Orleans v. Board of Com'rsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  2. In re the County of MonroeNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. City of Crown Point v. Lake CountyIndiana Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Dearden v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Bunk v. Port Authority of New York & New JerseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996

100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API