Baske v. Russell
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, C. J.
— The plaintiffs Baske had money to invest and on occasion had purchased notes from Stevens-Norton, Inc. The plaintiff William L. Baske (hereafter referred to as plaintiff) stopped in at that company’s place of business, and expressed his desire to purchase some *269accounts. Stevens-Norton suggested that he purchase the “Russell account.” The plaintiff gave his check for $5,640 for that $6,000 account. He was unaware that the money which he was advancing was to be the original consideration for the note and mortgage.
The defendant Arthur M. Russell, Jr. (hereafter called the defendant) being hard…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hafer v. SpaethWashington Supreme Court · 1945
- Eastman v. . ShawNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Acme Finance Co. v. ZapffeWashington Supreme Court · 1931
- Campbell v. Nichols & TompkinsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1868
3Cited by36 opinions
- Liebergesell v. EvansWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- Sparkman & McLean Co. v. Govan Investment TrustWashington Supreme Court · 1970
- Thweatt v. HommelCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
- Schmitt v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
- Aetna Finance Co. v. DarwinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.