Legal Opinion

Thweatt v. Hommel

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 6, 1992No. 27689-1-IPublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKennedy, J.

Robert Hommel appeals an award of usury penalties equal to the principal balance due from Ruby Thweatt on a $30,000 promissory note and the trial court's judgment requiring him to repay the interest he had received and to pay Thweatt's attorney fees incurred in pursuit of her usury claim. Because we conclude that the loan qualified for the business purpose exemption provided by RCW 19.52.080, we reverse and remand for entry of judgment in favor of Hommel on his counterclaim for judicial foreclosure of the deed of trust securing the note.

Facts

We will discuss the facts only insofar as they are…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. National Bank of Commerce v. ThomsenWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Baske v. RussellWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Pacesetter Real Estate, Inc. v. FasulesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  4. Para-Medical Leasing, Inc. v. HangenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
  5. Hendricks v. LakeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Wilson Court v. Tony Maroni'sWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Wilson Court Ltd. Partnership v. Tony Maroni's, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Phillips Building Co., Inc. v. AnCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
  4. Stiles v. KearneyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  5. In Re Parentage of JMKWashington Supreme Court · 2005

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API