Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Nichols & Tompkins

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 15, 1868PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On verdict for plaintiff, and points reserved by the court. This was a suit on a promissory note drawn in Newark, in this state, by the defendants, payable to their own order at the Newark City National Bank, and endorsed by them. After its execution, it was delivered in Newark to a Mr. Havell, to procure the money on it for the defendants.

Read the full summary

On verdict for plaintiff, and points reserved by the court. This was a suit on a promissory note drawn in Newark, in this state, by the defendants, payable to their own order at the Newark City National Bank, and endorsed by them. After its execution, it was delivered in Newark to a Mr. Havell, to procure the money on it for the defendants. Havell took it to New York, and gave it to one Gaulidet, a note broker, to be disposed of, and on returning to Newark he informed one of the defendants of the disposition which he had made of the note. Gaulidet sold the note to a Mr. Kirkland, at a…

1Opinion of the Court

Beasley, Chief Justice.

The note which forms the subject of this controversy, was put into writing and was-*83signed in this state, but it was passed away and came first into legal existence in the State of New York; in contemplation of law, therefore, it was made in this latter jurisdiction. But although thus made in New York it was, by its terms, payable in New Jersey, and consequently, in the absence of an expression of a different intention, is to be regulated, with respect to the law of interest, by the statutes of the latter state. In his commentaries on the Conflict of Laws, § 291, Judge…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Welland Canal Co. v. HathawayNew York Supreme Court · 1832
  2. Munn v. President & Directors of Commission Co.New York Supreme Court · 1818
  3. Powell v. WatersCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1826
  4. Bossange v. RossNew York Supreme Court · 1859
  5. Jenkins v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Baske v. RussellWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  2. United States Ex Rel. Noland Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1941
  3. Baske v. RussellWashington Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API