Legal Opinion

Sparkman & McLean Co. v. Govan Investment Trust

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 1970No. 40051PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHunter, C. J.

The plaintiff (respondent) Sparkman & McLean Co., upon motion to this court seeks to dismiss an appeal taken by the defendant (appellant) Govan Investment Trust, from a decree foreclosing a $400,000 real estate mortgage held by the plaintiff to secure the defendant’s loan. The trial court held the transaction nonusurious and granted summary judgment to the plaintiff. The defendant’s motion for summary judgment was denied.

The defendant in this case, pleading the defense of usury, seeks affirmative relief against the plaintiff. The plaintiff contends the case is now moot by reason of the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Griffith v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. State v. PersingerWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Treffry v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Hafer v. SpaethWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Boeing Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1968

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Aetna Life Insurance v. Washington Life & Disability Insurance Guaranty Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Childers v. ChildersWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Haddenham v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Madison v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2007

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API