Legal Opinion

Vance v. Ford

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 24, 2003No. 0012-12355; A116812PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.

Defendants appeal from a declaratory judgment and injunction that, among other provisions, prohibits their use of a private road (the roadway) that abuts three parcels of property owned by plaintiffs Seay, Vance, and Wells. Defendants challenge the trial court’s rejection of their defenses that plaintiffs’ complaint failed to state a claim and that plaintiffs lacked standing to seek relief. They also assert that Seay and Vance failed to prove a necessary element of their claims, namely that defendants substantially interfered with their easement rights in the roadway. Further, defendants…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Eckles v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Stanley v. MuellerOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Budget Rent-A-Car of Washington-Oregon, Inc. v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. J. Arlie Bryant, Inc. v. Columbia River Gorge CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  5. Marsh v. PullenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Roundy's Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  2. Kitras v. Town of AquinnahMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
  3. Pfaendler v. BruceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  4. State Ex Rel. Dewberry v. KulongoskiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  5. NORTHWEST STEELHEADERS ASS'N v. SimantelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API