Legal Opinion
Perrone v. State
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 6, 2010No. AC 31073PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ALVORD, J.
The plaintiffs, Josephine Perrone and Gail Perrone, administratrices of the estate of Daniel Riley, appeal from the judgment of the trial court dismissing their negligence action against the defendant state of Connecticut. On appeal, the plaintiffs claim that the court improperly concluded that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction because the plaintiffs’ claim against the state was barred by the doctrine of sovereign immunity. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The record and the complaint reveal the following undisputed facts and procedural history. On April 3, 2005,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Miller v. EganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Mahoney v. LensinkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Columbia Air Services, Inc. v. Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- D'ERAMO v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Capers v. LeeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Estate of Bochicchio v. QuinnConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Klemonski v. University of Connecticut Health CenterConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Harnage v. TorresConnecticut Superior Court · 2013