Legal Opinion
D'ERAMO v. Smith
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 17, 2005No. SC 17112PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SULLIVAN, C. J.
The plaintiff, Vincent D’Eramo, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his application for a writ of mandamus ordering the defendant, James R. Smith, claims commissioner (claims commissioner), to authorize his medical malpractice action against the state pursuant to General Statutes § 4-160 (b).1 The claims commissioner filed a motion to dismiss, claiming that the trial court lacked jurisdiction over the matter. The trial court dismissed the action, not on jurisdictional grounds, but because § 4-160 (b) did not apply retroactively to the plaintiffs…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Miller v. EganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Moore v. McNamaraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. FaradaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Struckman v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Lostritto v. Community Action Agency of New Haven, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Doe v. PetersenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Hanks v. Powder Ridge Restaurant Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Weber v. U.S. Sterling Securities, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- McKay v. LongmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
- Walsh v. JodoinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.