Estate of Bochicchio v. Quinn
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DiPENTIMA, C. J.
The plaintiff, the estate of Donna Bochicchio through the administrator, Karl J. Seitz, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing its complaint on the grounds of sovereign immunity.1 Specifically, the plaintiff argues that the doctrine of sovereign immunity does not apply in this case, and, therefore, the court improperly dismissed its bill of discovery.2 We conclude that the plaintiff failed to exhaust its administrative remedies, and, therefore, the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to consider the merits of the plaintiffs action.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Barde v. Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Concerned Citizens of Sterling v. Town of SterlingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Doe v. HeintzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Gold v. RowlandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Lyon v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Holmes v. Hartford HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
- Johnson v. FranklinCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2015