Legal Opinion

Capers v. Lee

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 26, 1996No. 15473PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKatz, J.

The sole issue on appeal is whether the plaintiffs notice of claim filed with the office of the claims commissioner of the state of Connecticut (claims commissioner), pursuant to General Statutes § 4-147,1 constitutes an “action” under General Statutes § 52-5922 *267so as to save the present wrongful death action, which was commenced more than four years after the alleged incident, from being time barred. We conclude that it does not.

The following facts are undisputed. On February 21, 1995, the plaintiff, Paul M. Capers, administrator of the estate of Donnie J. Capers, filed this complaint in the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hinchliffe v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  2. White v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  3. Barde v. Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  4. Duguay v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  5. Amore v. FrankelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Babes v. BennettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. Bell v. SchellWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Henriquez v. AllegreConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  4. Labow v. LabowConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  5. Metcalfe v. SandfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API