Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Bandman

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 2010No. 2009-2316PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Marc Benjamin Bandman of Lewis Center, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0038487, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1987. Based upon its findings that respondent committed multiple violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct in administering a client’s family trust, the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline recommends that we suspend respondent’s license to practice indefinitely. We adopt the board’s findings of misconduct and the recommended sanction.

Misconduct

{¶ 2} In April 2009, relator, Disciplinary Counsel, filed a complaint charging…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. BroerenOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. BelockOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. BelockOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. ChurillaOhio Supreme Court · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dayton Bar Assn. v. ParisiOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Ass'n v. PryatelOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Columbus Bar Assn. v. Striff (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. Buttars (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Columbiana County Bar Association v. BarborakOhio Supreme Court · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API