Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Churilla
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
We have said on many occasions that “the appropriate sanction for misappropriation of client funds and continued neglect of duty is disbarment.” Columbus Bar Assn. v. Sterner (1996), 77 Ohio St.3d 164, 167, 672 N.E.2d 633, 635, and cases cited therein. The facts in this case not only parallel those in Sterner, namely, a continued pattern of stealing from clients and neglect of client interests, but, as in Sterner, the respondent also seeks to mitigate the severity of any sanction by reference to his psychological condition unsupported by properly admitted expert testimony.
Moreover, the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. FowerbaughOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. TrumboOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Columbus Bar Ass'n v. SternerOhio Supreme Court · 1996
3Cited by19 opinions
- Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. BelockOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. GallagherOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Disciplinary Counsel v. HunterOhio Supreme Court · 2005
- Cleveland Bar Assn. v. BelockOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Disciplinary Counsel v. GallagherOhio Supreme Court · 1998
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.