Legal Opinion

Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Belock

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1998No. 97-2273PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Per curiam

After reviewing the record in this case, we have adopted the findings and conclusions of the board, but not its recommendation. We do not accept respondent’s claim that the extenuating circumstances justified his use of client funds. No circumstances ever justify the deliberate misappropriation of client’s funds for a lawyer’s personal benefit.

The continuing public confidence in the judicial system and the bar requires that the strictest discipline be imposed in misappropriation cases. We have previously held that the appropriate discipline when a lawyer knowingly converts client funds is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. ChurillaOhio Supreme Court · 1997

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. DixonOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. HunterOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. BelockOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. KellyOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. HarrisOhio Supreme Court · 2002

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API