Legal Opinion

Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Ass'n v. Pryatel

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 2013No. 2011-1727PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Mark Robert Pryatel of Euclid, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0019678, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1983. In February 2011, relator, the Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association, filed a two-count complaint charging Pryatel with misuse of client funds and other professional misconduct involving two client matters. Pryatel did not file an answer — even though he had initially cooperated with relator’s investigation and received notice of the complaint by certified mail. Relator moved for an entry of default, and the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. BroerenOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. DixonOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Trumbull County Bar Ass'n v. KafantarisOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Columbus Bar Assn. v. Van SickleOhio Supreme Court · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cincinnati Bar Association v. HoskinsOhio Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association v. PryatelOhio Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API