Farmers Insurance Group v. Stonik Ex Rel. Stonik
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
FACTS
This case involves interpreting language appearing in an automobile insurance contract. The following facts are not in dispute.
Co-respondents James and Doris Maleski (“the Maleskis”) owned three vehicles insured by Farmers Insurance Group (“Farmers”). All three insurance contracts contained identical language with one key exception: the Maleskis’ 1987 Ford Ranger carried bodily injury payout limitations of only $15,000 per person and $30,000 per accident. The Maleskis’ two other vehicles, a Mustang and a Ranchero, were insured up to $30,000 per person and $60,000 per accident.
In…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Harvey's Wagon Wheel, Inc. v. MacSweenNevada Supreme Court · 1980
- SENTENEY BY SENTENEY v. Fire Ins. ExchangeNevada Supreme Court · 1985
- Shefner v. Illinois Farmers InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
- Neumann v. STANDARD FIRE INS. CO. OF HARTFORDNevada Supreme Court · 1985
- Yosemite Insurance v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by30 opinions
- Lee v. GNLV CORP.Nevada Supreme Court · 2000
- Payne v. WestonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
- United Nat'l Ins. Co. v. Frontier Ins. Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 2004
- United National Insurance v. Frontier InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 2004
- Farmers Insurance Exchange v. NealNevada Supreme Court · 2003
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.