Neumann v. STANDARD FIRE INS. CO. OF HARTFORD
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This is an appeal from a summary judgment in favor of Standard Fire Insurance of Hartford, Connecticut (Standard Fire), finding it had complied with NRS 687B. 145(1), thereby preventing the stacking of uninsured motorist coverages. Our examination of the insurance policy in question and the record persuades us that the trial court erred in its determination.
Appellant’s two automobiles are insured by Standard Fire under the same policy. Appellant Jeffrey C. Neumann was a resident and family member in the home of appellants Charles F. and Helen J. Neumann. During the policy period,…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Allstate Insurance v. MaglishNevada Supreme Court · 1978
- Yosemite Insurance v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 1982
4Cited by17 opinions
- Farmers Insurance Group v. Stonik Ex Rel. StonikNevada Supreme Court · 1994
- Maxwell v. Allstate Insurance CompaniesNevada Supreme Court · 1986
- Bove v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNevada Supreme Court · 1990
- Torres v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeNevada Supreme Court · 1990
- Capitol Indemnity Corp. v. WrightDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2004
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.