Legal Opinion

Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Neal

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 2003No. 37977PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This is an appeal from a declaratory judgment finding that appellant Farmers Insurance Exchange must provide “Uninsured Motorist” (UM) benefits under an automobile liability policy in an amount that exceeds the minimum statutory requirements for such coverage. We conclude that the district court erred as a matter of law.

On November 5, 1996, respondent Flossie Neal was seriously injured in an automobile accident with a hit and run motorist. At the time of the accident, Flossie Neal resided with her daughter, Regina Neal. Both mother and daughter owned their own motor vehicles; each…

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. National Union Fire Insurance v. Reno's Executive Air, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Grand Hotel Gift Shop v. Granite State InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Musser v. Bank of AmericaNevada Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Farmers Insurance Group v. Stonik Ex Rel. StonikNevada Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Farmers Insurance Exchange v. YoungNevada Supreme Court · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by37 opinions

  1. Powell v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Weddell v. H2O, INC.Nevada Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Century Sur. Co. v. AndrewNevada Supreme Court · 2018
  4. LGS Architects, Inc. v. Concordia Homes of NevadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  5. NOLM, LLC v. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2004

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API