Noval v. Haug
New York Supreme Court
Motion by plaintiff to strike out as irrelevant the whole of paragraph sixth and a portion of paragraph second in each of the answers of the defendants in this action.
1Opinion of the CourtBurr, J.
Plaintiff moves upon the pleadings and upon the judgment-roll in the case of Tillie von Au, as executrix, etc., against Louis Magenheimer and others, to strike out as irrelevant the whole of paragraph sixth and a portion of paragraph second in each of the answers of the defendants in this action. Such a motion must be heard upon the pleadings alone, and the judgment-roll referred to cannot, there*199fore, be considered. Bailies Code Pl. 563; Ford v. Mattice, 14 How. Pr. 91; Stewart v. Frost, 15 Misc. Rep. 621.
The paragraphs marked sixth in the answers of the two defendants are identical. This…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Uggla v. BrokawAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
- Dinkelspiel v. New York Evening Journal Publishing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
- John D. Park & Sons Co. v. National Wholesale Druggists' Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
- Cardeza v. OsbornNew York Supreme Court · 1900
- William H. Frank Brewing Co. v. HammersenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gramkow v. Farmers Cooperative Irrigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1929
- Kamin v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1953
- Broderick v. HorvattNew York Supreme Court · 1933
- Thorer & Hollander, Inc. v. FuchsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
- Hall v. United States Casualty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1925