Hall v. United States Casualty Co.

Herricik, J.:

The plaintiffs make this motion pursuant to the provisions of rule 103 of the Rules of Civil Practice to strike out as “ irrelevant ” that part of the amended answer reading as follows:

“ For a third separate answer and complete defense herein, defendant alleges:

“ IV. That at various and divers times prior to December 9, 1922, plaintiffs’ agent, employee and representative C. Rexford Hall, presented to the defendant, with intent to defraud, fictitious and false claims of alleged automobile accidents, involving large sums of money and at various and divers times prior to and…