Legal Opinion

Cardeza v. Osborn

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1900PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Motion by the plaintiffs to strike out matter pleaded as a defence as irrelevant.

1Opinion of the Court

Gaynor, J.:

This motion is made under section 545 of the Code of Civil Procedure to strike out as “ irrelevant ” matter pleaded as a “ defence The matter designated constitutes all of the matter so pleaded except a small part of it which if left alone could be to no purpose whatever. Why it is not included in the motion does not appear. The motion must therefore be deemed one to strike out the so-called defence in its entirety. Such a motion cannot be made, even though the matter does not constitute any defence, as seems to be the case here. The Code provision for the striking out of…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Stroock Plush Co. v. TalcottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  2. Durst v. Brooklyn Heights RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Noval v. HaugNew York Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Tierney v. Helvetia-Swiss Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  5. Bulova v. E. L. Barnett, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API