Legal Opinion
Broderick v. Horvatt
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 21, 1933PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPersonius, J.
The plaintiff is in possession of and liquidating the State Bank of Binghamton, N. Y., hereinafter referred to as the “ State Bank.” The action is brought for the benefit of the depositors. The defendants were the. directors of the State Bank. The complaint alleges that they were “ careless, negligent and reckless ” in performing their duties, whereby the depositors were damaged.
The State Bank was the successor of a private bank owned and conducted by Andrew J. Horvatt who became the president of the former.
The defendants’ negligence is alleged to have been committed in connection with the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Attorney-General v. Guardian Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Bradner v. . FaulknerNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Kavanaugh v. . Commonwealth Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Cassidy v. . UhlmannNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Gerseta Corp. v. Silk Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Newfield v. EttlingerNew York Supreme Court · 1959
- Van Schaick v. AronNew York Supreme Court · 1938
- Drake v. New York State Electric & Gas Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1937