Thorer & Hollander, Inc. v. Fuchs
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtMerrell, J.
In its complaint the plaintiff alleges that on or about April 21, 1931, a certain copartnership, known as A. Morgenstern & Bro., purchased certain Persian skins from a corporation known as Thorer & Hollander, Inc., on a credit of four months. Under instructions from the purchaser of said furs the said goods *360were sMpped by the plaintiff, respondent, to a concern known as A. Hollander & Son for dyeing. Two days later, on April 23, 1931, the purchasers of said furs, the firm of A. Morganstern & Bro., representing themselves as the owners thereof, applied to the defendant, appellant, for a loan…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- De Wolf v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
- Green v. KempMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1816
- Jackson ex dem. Bartlett v. HenryNew York Supreme Court · 1813
- Shufelt v. ShufeltNew York Court of Chancery · 1841
- Williams v. . TiltNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Broad & Wall Corp. v. O'ConnorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
- Broad & Wall Corp. v. O'ConnorNew York Supreme Court · 1962