Legal Opinion
Walker v. Meehan
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 24, 1987No. A033077PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RUSHING, J.*
This is an appeal by the District Attorney of Alameda County from an order of the superior court granting a preliminary injunction which prevented any interference with the playing of the game of Pai Gow in licensed cardrooms. In light of our agreement with the decision in Sullivan v. Fox (1987) 189 Cal.App.3d 673 [235 Cal.Rptr. 5], we reverse the order.
Factual and Procedural Background
Respondents are the owners of licensed card rooms in the City of Emery-ville. Penal Code section 330 prohibits “gaming,” which is defined as the playing for value of 12 enumerated games and…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Keeler v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Bishop v. City of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Pryor v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Pryor v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- In Re HubbardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. WhartonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. TakacsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
- Hunter v. City of WhittierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Eller Media Co. v. Community Redevelopment AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Oliver v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.