Legal Opinion
Hunter v. City of Whittier
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 10, 1989No. B029923PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ASHBY, J.
Plaintiffs Robert Hunter and Scott Hunter own homes in a residential zone of the City of Whittier (hereinafter City). In 1985 they installed satellite television receiving antennas, also known as satellite dish antennas or satellite earth stations, on the roofs of their homes. City subsequently enacted an ordinance regulating satellite television receiving antennas in a residential zone, requiring an owner to obtain a conditional use permit. Plaintiffs applied for permits. City officials informed plaintiffs that a conditional use permit would be granted only on conditions that…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Cohen v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- King v. MeeseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Tustin Heights Assn. v. BD. OF SUPERVISORS OF ORANGE CTY.California Court of Appeal · 1959
- Stoddard v. EdelmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Schroeder v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Bullock v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Rodriguez v. SolisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Hilb, Rogal & Hamilton Insurance Services v. RobbCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Sahlolbei v. Providence Healthcare, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- Pacific Landmark Hotel, Ltd. v. Marriott Hotels, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.