Legal Opinion
State v. Takacs
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided April 11, 1991No. 1 CA-CR 89-1238, 1 CA-CR 89-1239PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BROOKS, Judge.
The state of Arizona appeals from the trial court’s dismissal of an indictment charging appellees Cheryl Lynn Todd and Steve Takacs (defendants) with multiple counts of promotion of gambling, a class 5 felony in violation of A.R.S. section 13-3303. We consider whether dismissal was required because section 13-3303 is unconstitutionally vague. We find that the statute is not unconstitutionally vague and therefore reverse.
BACKGROUND
The following evidence was presented to the grand jury. Takacs owned a bar called the Woodpecker Lounge in Glendale, Arizona. There were three…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Smith v. GoguenSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- State v. WomackCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- Leonard H. v. Beneficial Arizona, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. CidCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
- Lewis v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
- State v. McLambCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.