Humboldt County v. Van Duzer
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
KOFORD, J., pro tem.
This is an appeal from a judgmenl in favor of plaintiff quieting title against defendants to a strip of land in Humboldt County, acquired by the county in the year 1880, for the purpose of a public road and ferry crossing over Eel River.
The land in question was deeded in 1880 to the county by deiendant Van Duzer’s predecessor, George H. Singley, for a money consideration, by an ordinary grant deed describing the land conveyed by metes and hounds, conveying the fee and not specifying that the land was conveyed for road and ferry purposes. The deed was made in pursuance of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Archer v. Salinas CityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Town of San Leandro v. Le BretonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Mitchell v. HawleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- People Ex Rel. State Bd. of Harbor Comm'rs v. KerberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Ames v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Greif v. DulleaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- City of Imperial Beach v. AlgertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Richert v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Barcroft v. LivacichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- County of Sacramento v. LauszusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.