Ames v. City of San Diego
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtDe Haven, J.
The plaintiffs are husband and wife, and this action was brought for the purpose of determining an adverse claim made by the defendant to certain land which, the complaint alleges, is owned by the plaintiff, Catalina S. Ames. The answer alleges that the defendant is the owner of the land in controversy, and this was the only issue made by the pleadings. The action was tried by the court without a jury, and judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiffs. The defendant appeals from the judgment, and from an order denying its motion for a new trial. It is claimed by the defendant that the findings…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hart v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Hoadley v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
- City of San Francisco v. CanavanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Townsend v. GreeleySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Board of Education v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. City of San FernandoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- People Ex Rel. State Bd. of Harbor Comm'rs v. KerberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- City of San Diego v. Cuyamaca Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
- Patton v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Goldman v. QuadratoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.