Mitchell v. Hawley
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
This is an action to recover damages on a bond for a temporary injunction in an action in the United States circuit court. The judgment was for plaintiffs, and defendants appeal from the judgment, and from an order denying a new trial. The court found that plaintiffs Were damaged by the injunction, generally, in the sum of $770, and that they were also entitled to the further sum of $400, for attorneys’ fees in procuring its dissolution.
*3021. We have carefully examined the elaborate argument of the learned counsel for appellants to the point-that the evidence does not justify the court in finding…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bustamente v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Randall v. . CarpenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Allen v. BrownNew York Supreme Court · 1872
3Cited by49 opinions
- Bowers v. Fulton CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
- City of Los Angeles v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- People Ex Rel. State Bd. of Harbor Comm'rs v. KerberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Patton v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Curtiss v. BachmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.