Legal Opinion

Barcroft v. Livacich

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 5, 1939No. Civ. 2454PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRIFFIN, J. —

This was an ordinary action in ejectment filed January 5, 1937. Respondent, at the trial, established proof of her representative capacity, the record title to the property in Floretta Fraser, deceased, and claimed that appellants wrongfully ousted her from possession of the premises and that they continued to withhold possession thereof unlawfully and without right. After the production of this evidence respondent rested her case. Appellants moved for a nonsuit, which motion was denied and they thereafter produced evidence in an endeavor to establish their claim of right of…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Boone v. TemplemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Mattingly v. PennieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Steinberger v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Verbeck v. ClymerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Hicks v. LovellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Dinneen v. YoungerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  2. Ayoob v. AyoobCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. Miller v. MillerMontana Supreme Court · 1948
  4. B & B Sulphur Co. v. KelleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  5. Wescoatt v. MeekerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API