Legal Opinion

Walsh v. Mckeen

California Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1888No. 11084PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. ' The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Belcher, C. C.

This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment entered against him, and from an order denying a new trial.

The findings cover all the issues and are not assailed, but it is claimed that errors of law were committed by the court, for which a new trial should be granted.

In the complaint it is alleged that Thomas Walsh, the plaintiff’s testator, and the defendant entered into partnership for the purpose of constructing a sewer in the city of San José; that while the sewer was being con*520structed Walsh died, and defendant afterward completed the work; that about the time they…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Emery v. . PeaseNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  2. Grain v. AldrichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  3. Farmers' Natl. Gold Bank v. StoverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Ross v. CornellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Blood v. FairbanksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Frost v. WitterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Zellner v. WassmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Doolittle v. McConnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Rosemead Co. v. Shipley Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. GreenbachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API