Legal Opinion

Lane v. Tanner

California Supreme Court

Decided August 13, 1909No. L.A. No. 2253PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of defendants. The plaintiff as trustee for Addie L. Allen, a bankrupt, seeks recovery for the alleged fraudulent conversion of property belonging to the firm of A. C. Williams & Co., in which Mrs. Allen was a partner. The complaint contains averments to the effect that on April 22, 1905, while Addie L. Allen’s petition in bankruptcy was pending before the federal court, the defendants unlawfully conspired to take certain personal property of A. C. Williams & Co. situated at the dairy of said firm, and by means of a sale thereof, to convert it to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mock v. City of Santa RosaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Sutton v. SymonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Perkins v. Maier & Zobelein BreweryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Totten v. BarlowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Crackel v. CrackelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  3. Wold v. WoldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  4. Lukasik v. LukasikCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Garrison v. North Pasadena Land Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API