Crackel v. Crackel
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an interlocutory decree of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco in an action for divorce. E. P. Mogan, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.
This is an appeal from an interlocutory decree of divorce granted the plaintiff from the defendant upon the ground of the defendant’s extreme cruelty.
In due time after service of summons the defendant appeared in the action and filed a demurrer, which was overruled, and having failed to answer within the time allowed by the court’s order, her default was regularly entered; whereupon the cause was placed upon the calendar, and after hearing the testimony of the plaintiff and of two corroborating witnesses, an interlocutory decree of divorce was regularly rendered and entered.
The defendant…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Foley v. FoleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Bullard v. StoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Sutton v. SymonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Lane v. TannerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Randall v. FreedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Carney v. SimmondsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Uva v. EvansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Buck v. MorrossisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Reeves v. ReevesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Heathman v. VantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.