Garrison v. North Pasadena Land Etc. Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
This was an action for an injunction to prevent respondent from cutting off a certain water supply to which appellants asserted a right as consumers upon the tender of the proper compensation therefor. The appeal is upen the judgment-roll alone from a judgment adverse to plaintiffs who take the position that the findings do not support the judgment.
The court found that defendant was not a public service corporation within the meaning of the constitution and statutes of the state of California, but that at all times since its incorporation it has been a private mutual corporation organized for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hildreth v. Montecito Creek Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Sather Banking Co. v. Arthur R. Briggs Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Barton v. Riverside Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Burr v. MacLay Rancho Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Lane v. TannerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gilmour v. North Pasadena Land Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
- Marin Water & Power Co. v. Town of SausalitoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Franscioni v. Soledad Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. GiffordIdaho Supreme Court · 1913
- Platner v. VincentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.