Legal Opinion

Mock v. City of Santa Rosa

California Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1899No. S.F. Nos. 1597, 1599PublishedCited by 51 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

—The plaintiff, a resident taxpayer of the city of Santa Bosa, brought this action against the following named defendants: “The city of Santa Bosa as a municipal corporation, E. F. Woodward as mayor of said city, the common council of said city as the legislative body thereof, F. Berka, C. H. Collins, E. D. Harris, Thomas P. Keegan, George A. Tapper, and J. S. Wilson, as members of and composing said common council and the legislative body of said city of Santa Bosa, C. L. Mobley as city clerk and auditor of said city, M. Y. Yan derboof as treasurer of said city of Santa Rosa,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wickersham v. CrittendenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Sichler v. LookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Amy v. The SupervisorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  4. Linden v. CaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Litchfield v. . FlintNew York Court of Appeals · 1887

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Muskopf v. Corning Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Miller v. McKinnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Schaefer v. BerinsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Van Atta v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Singleton v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API