Legal Opinion

Davenport v. Doyle

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 18, 1916No. 6695PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Error from District Court, Okfuskee County; John Caruthers, Judge. Action by Clarence William Doyle, a minor, by A. D. Doyle, his next friend, against R. G. Davenport and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error. •

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BLEAKMORE, C.

This action was commenced in the district court of Okfuskee county, Okla., on December 6, 1913, in the name of Clarence William Doyle, an infant, by his next friend, as plaintiff, to cancel and remove,- as clouds upon his title, two tax deeds, describing his allotted lands, executed by the treasurer of Okfuskee county, to the defendant R. G. Davenport, and certain leases made by said Davenport to his codefendants, R. A. Bivins and T. R. Bradley. The tax deeds are by the petition declared to be void for divers reasons, to some of which we deem it unnecessary to advert.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Wade v. Crouch and EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
  3. English v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Dawson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Frazier v. PrinceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Lind v. McKinleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  2. Smith v. BostaphSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Parks v. LyonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Campbell v. McGrathSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. Perry v. SnyderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API