Legal Opinion

Keller v. Hawk

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 5, 1907PublishedCited by 31 opinions

Error from the District Court of Cleveland County; before Clinton F. Irwin, Trial Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Burwell, J.:

The appellee, S. C. Iiawk, was the owner of lots numbered seventeen to thirty-two, inclusive, in block numbered eleven, in the town of Lexington, in Cleveland county. These lots were sold for taxes and bid in by the county. The county sold the certificate of purchase to the appellee, E. J. Keller, who, on December 24, 1898, obtained a tax deed for the same and went into possession of the lots. On October 30, 1900, the appellee commenced this action in ejectment. The appellant answered, denying generally, the allegations of the petition, and then…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Wofford v. McKinnaTexas Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Redfield v. ParksSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Waterson v. DevoeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  4. Lowenstein v. SextonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  5. Mason v. CrowderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1885

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Sandlin v. BarkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Parks v. LyonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  3. Blanchard v. ReedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  4. Cochran v. SullivanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Hatchett v. GoingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API