Legal Opinion

Blaine County Bank v. Noble

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 8, 1916No. 6628PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error from District Court, Blaine County; James R. Tolbert, Judge. Action by Charles Loren Noble, by Emma G. Noble, his guardian, and another, against Percy A. Burhans and others, and the Blaine County Bank by leave was made a party defendant. Judgment for plaintiffs, and certain defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

COLLIER, C.

This action was brought by Charles L. Noble, a minor, by Emma G. Noble, his guardian, and J. A. Burhans, trustee, against Percy A. Burhans, Daisy M. Burhans, W. M. Gardner, and E. B. Curtis, as defendants. Plaintiffs sought to recover judgment on promissory notes described in the petition, with interest, and the foreclosure of a mortgage given to secure the same. A demurrer was filed by Gardner and Curtis to the petition, and said cause was set down for trial and tried without said demurrer being called to the attention of the court or being acted upon by the court, which…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jackson v. MaddoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  2. Lane v. WrightSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  3. Fordyce v. VickersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  4. McLemore v. AndersonMississippi Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Gibson v. PekarekSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Scudder v. HartNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Abraham v. GelwickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Gulager v. CoonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Pacific Coast Joint Stock Land Bank v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Perry v. SnyderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API