Legal Opinion
Carpenter v. Planning & Zoning Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 13, 1979PublishedCited by 91 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLongo, J.
In these eases, the plaintiffs, Bruce R. Carpenter et al., have appealed from separate judgments of the Superior Court and the Court of Common Pleas sustaining the pleas in abatement by the defendants in each ease. The plaintiffs’ appeals arise out of a common nucleus of facts and are sufficiently similar to permit their disposition in one opinion.
No finding was requested or draft finding filed, but the facts necessary for a consideration of the issues raised are uncontroverted as summarized in *584the briefs. On August 19,1975, Robert S. Jones and Kenneth B. Tate, the defendants in both cases…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Connecticut Life & Health Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. JacksonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Summ v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- Rybinski v. State Employees' Retirement CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Guerriero v. GalassoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
- Akin v. City of NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by91 opinions
- Zizka v. Water Pollution Control AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Upson v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Pet v. Department of Health ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Frito-Lay, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- LaCroix v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.