Legal Opinion

Scalzo v. City of Danbury

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 8, 1992No. 14485PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBerdon, J.

The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court properly rendered a summary judgment in favor of the defendants because the doctrine of res judicata barred the plaintiffs’ action for damages for the alleged taking of the named plaintiff’s property.1 We affirm the judgment of the trial court, but on different grounds.2 The trial court’s decision was predicated upon the claim preclusion aspect of res judicata; we rule on the basis of issue preclusion. We hold that the taking issue was fully and fairly litigated, so as to preclude the plaintiff from relitigating the issue of whether the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Corey v. Avco-Lycoming DivisionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  3. State v. EllisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  4. Frito-Lay, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  5. In Re Juvenile Appeal (83-De)Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Larsen Chelsey Realty Co. v. LarsenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. Jackson v. R. G. Whipple, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  3. Northern States Power Co. v. BugherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Bloom v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  5. Crochiere v. Board of Education of Town of EnfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API