Legal Opinion

Rad-Razorback Ltd. Partnership v. B.G. Coney Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided September 22, 1986No. 85-281PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Steele Hays, Justice.

This case involves disputes that arose during the construction of The Razorback Square Shopping Center in Little Rock. Appellants are the developers, RAD-Razorback Limited Partnership and others, and appellee is the contractor, B.G. Coney Company. The disputes center primarily around site preparation and earthwork.

Coney brought suit against RAD-Razorback for items of work he claimed were not part of the contract, but were “extra work” that warranted compensation above the contract price. RAD-Razorback took the position that the items were called for by the contract and it…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Walt Bennett Ford, Inc. v. Pulaski County Special School DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  3. Rose v. DunnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  4. Wynn v. Sklar & Phillips Oil CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  5. SD Leasing, Inc. v. RNF CORP.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. Lake View School District No. 25 v. HuckabeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  2. Sturgis v. SkokosSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Wade v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  4. Noland v. NolandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  5. Goodwin v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API